Comments on: Sweet review in the LA Times http://www.cheatersguidetobaseball.com/2007/04/02/sweet-review-in-the-la-times/ Baseball, Cheating, and Rules discussion at the author's blog for the Cheater's Guide to Baseball Fri, 07 Dec 2007 06:29:21 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: DMZ http://www.cheatersguidetobaseball.com/2007/04/02/sweet-review-in-the-la-times/#comment-290 DMZ Wed, 04 Apr 2007 20:40:05 +0000 http://www.zumsteg.net/cheatersguide/2007/04/02/sweet-review-in-the-la-times/#comment-290 I guess -- at this point, there's been no talk about future editions at all, and if they are, I think we'd still be bound by the constraints of the trade paper format-- but yeah, I'll talk about some of the tradeoffs we made in a "making of" post at some point. I guess — at this point, there’s been no talk about future editions at all, and if they are, I think we’d still be bound by the constraints of the trade paper format– but yeah, I’ll talk about some of the tradeoffs we made in a “making of” post at some point.

]]> By: Paul http://www.cheatersguidetobaseball.com/2007/04/02/sweet-review-in-the-la-times/#comment-287 Paul Wed, 04 Apr 2007 19:14:04 +0000 http://www.zumsteg.net/cheatersguide/2007/04/02/sweet-review-in-the-la-times/#comment-287 Seems to me that the review is good ammunition to send to the publisher, saying "should have left that chapter in there". Maybe they could add it for a later edition? Paul Seems to me that the review is good ammunition to send to the publisher, saying “should have left that chapter in there”. Maybe they could add it for a later edition?

Paul

]]>