Comments on: Where should Bonds be on the home run list? http://www.cheatersguidetobaseball.com/2007/05/08/where-should-bonds-be-on-the-home-run-list/ Baseball, Cheating, and Rules discussion at the author's blog for the Cheater's Guide to Baseball Fri, 07 Dec 2007 06:29:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 By: DMZ http://www.cheatersguidetobaseball.com/2007/05/08/where-should-bonds-be-on-the-home-run-list/#comment-770 DMZ Sat, 26 May 2007 02:57:41 +0000 http://www.cheatersguidetobaseball.com/2007/05/08/where-should-bonds-be-on-the-home-run-list/#comment-770 On Bonds breaking rules - technically, when he was taking Deca (per Game of Shadows), that was using an illegal drug and a violation of baseball's nebulous and unenforced testing policy. THG, though -- yup yup. On Bonds breaking rules – technically, when he was taking Deca (per Game of Shadows), that was using an illegal drug and a violation of baseball’s nebulous and unenforced testing policy.

THG, though — yup yup.

]]> By: fgf http://www.cheatersguidetobaseball.com/2007/05/08/where-should-bonds-be-on-the-home-run-list/#comment-747 fgf Sat, 19 May 2007 01:14:07 +0000 http://www.cheatersguidetobaseball.com/2007/05/08/where-should-bonds-be-on-the-home-run-list/#comment-747 HGH benefits are a cloudy issue. Some think they replicate steroids benefits, others think they do nothing but enable a player to recover from workouts quicker. I think Derek should start a discussion on HGH solely. HGH benefits are a cloudy issue. Some think they replicate steroids benefits, others think they do nothing but enable a player to recover from workouts quicker.

I think Derek should start a discussion on HGH solely.

]]> By: joser http://www.cheatersguidetobaseball.com/2007/05/08/where-should-bonds-be-on-the-home-run-list/#comment-738 joser Wed, 16 May 2007 19:33:25 +0000 http://www.cheatersguidetobaseball.com/2007/05/08/where-should-bonds-be-on-the-home-run-list/#comment-738 HGH (among others) is still undetectable with the urine tests MLB uses. Just saying.... HGH (among others) is still undetectable with the urine tests MLB uses. Just saying….

]]> By: Evan http://www.cheatersguidetobaseball.com/2007/05/08/where-should-bonds-be-on-the-home-run-list/#comment-734 Evan Fri, 11 May 2007 17:03:32 +0000 http://www.cheatersguidetobaseball.com/2007/05/08/where-should-bonds-be-on-the-home-run-list/#comment-734 Where should Bonds be on the homerun list? Exactly where he is - he didn't break any rules. Where should Bonds be on the homerun list? Exactly where he is – he didn’t break any rules.

]]> By: DMZ http://www.cheatersguidetobaseball.com/2007/05/08/where-should-bonds-be-on-the-home-run-list/#comment-728 DMZ Thu, 10 May 2007 03:57:10 +0000 http://www.cheatersguidetobaseball.com/2007/05/08/where-should-bonds-be-on-the-home-run-list/#comment-728 It totally doesn't account for steroid use for players, either in possible performance increases or the overall increase in quality of play due to possible injury reduction to pitchers. It totally doesn’t account for steroid use for players, either in possible performance increases or the overall increase in quality of play due to possible injury reduction to pitchers.

]]> By: DMZ http://www.cheatersguidetobaseball.com/2007/05/08/where-should-bonds-be-on-the-home-run-list/#comment-727 DMZ Thu, 10 May 2007 03:54:37 +0000 http://www.cheatersguidetobaseball.com/2007/05/08/where-should-bonds-be-on-the-home-run-list/#comment-727 Fixed the 73/83 bit. Fixed the 73/83 bit.

]]> By: fddf http://www.cheatersguidetobaseball.com/2007/05/08/where-should-bonds-be-on-the-home-run-list/#comment-726 fddf Thu, 10 May 2007 03:52:54 +0000 http://www.cheatersguidetobaseball.com/2007/05/08/where-should-bonds-be-on-the-home-run-list/#comment-726 Derek - Interesting read. But does it take into account steroid use by pitchers? I think we can all agree that steroids benefit pitchers - Look no further than Paxton Crawford, and Jason Grimsley who go into detail describing steroids benefits for pitchers. Could a pitcher on steroids perhaps rob a hitter of homeruns? Especially during Bonds clean years of 1986-1999? Also, What are your thoughts on Clemens? In a strange sort of way, he's the pitcher version of Bonds - He never seems to get old. Think he may have used something? I would also like to know your thoughts on Bonds performance this season - Great? Or tainted? Or both? Is Bonds producing the way he is this year because he's possibly the best player ever, or do you think he's doing something? Perhaps undetectable Amphetamines? Derek – Interesting read. But does it take into account steroid use by pitchers? I think we can all agree that steroids benefit pitchers – Look no further than Paxton Crawford, and Jason Grimsley who go into detail describing steroids benefits for pitchers. Could a pitcher on steroids perhaps rob a hitter of homeruns? Especially during Bonds clean years of 1986-1999? Also, What are your thoughts on Clemens? In a strange sort of way, he’s the pitcher version of Bonds – He never seems to get old. Think he may have used something?

I would also like to know your thoughts on Bonds performance this season – Great? Or tainted? Or both? Is Bonds producing the way he is this year because he’s possibly the best player ever, or do you think he’s doing something? Perhaps undetectable Amphetamines?

]]> By: bryan http://www.cheatersguidetobaseball.com/2007/05/08/where-should-bonds-be-on-the-home-run-list/#comment-720 bryan Wed, 09 May 2007 21:10:00 +0000 http://www.cheatersguidetobaseball.com/2007/05/08/where-should-bonds-be-on-the-home-run-list/#comment-720 I think it's supposed to be <b>-83</b> in this sentence "Or, -131 in the first case, -73 in the second case." I think it’s supposed to be -83 in this sentence “Or, -131 in the first case, -73 in the second case.”

]]>